Cebollinos Machismos
(H.T. Dr. Sanity.)
(It's 17MB, so my apologies to those of you with a dial-up service.)
This is the four aces post on Grandpa John's. (I just realized that the name of this blog was not Grandpa's John!)
This is a blog site dedicated to fairness!










First, as evangelical scholar and thinker John Armstrong notes, our churches have come to see a specific set of conservative social issues as synonymous or necessary for anyone who truly believes.I'm not sure that "our churches have come to see..." is entirely accurate - as an Episcopalian, I can tell you there are most certainly churches that have not done that.
...when our hearts start believing that Christ's salvation by faith through grace is somehow dependent on a certain political perspective or certain views on social issues, we blaspheme the name of Christ and pervert his holy gospel! This should not be among the people of God.
A second great danger is that Christians start believing culture will be renewed through political action.I suspect he's right, which is why his earlier points are so important.
...Right now, I suspect many will not go to church because they associate the evangelical church with the Republican Party. This ought not be so among the people of God.
With that said, let me add a few disclaimers.We are supposed to set examples for our fellow Christians and those we hope to bring to Christianity.
First, Christianity is a not a private thing that should be divorced from politics. It is a worldview that, if taken seriously, must impact all of life, including one's political perspective.
Second, while our churches should be welcoming to all people, they should not compromise the specific teachings of the Bible...True love means speaking the truth (though true love also means speaking the truth in compassion and humility).Kinda defeats the purpose, otherwise.
This balance is a difficult one to sustain.A lot of this could be controversial, even among Christians, but it was this line that struck me as most likely to be so:
For readers who are not Christians, if you have been turned off from Christianity because you are a liberal, I apologize on behalf of the church.There's a real tendency (I know I have it) to respond: why should I apologize when I haven't done anything wrong?






Sometimes Murphy wields his Law like the Robert De Niro version of Al Capone - with a baseball bat, whacking you over the head with it, again and again, until your data is spreading in a crimson stain across the starched white tablecloth of your life. The second half of that first sentence proves that it's equally true that a good metaphor can be stretched only so far, until it screams and breaks on the rack like a...
Oh, never mind.
Police estimated that the crowds exceeded 220 million people, but they reported no incidents of violence.
Many workplaces flew the American flag, as usual, to express their ongoing devotion to the values and freedoms for which generations of U.S. troops have fought and died."



As for Katie Couric taking over the CBS news: if you spot me a whoop, I could probably muster a de-do, but I'd have to borrow the de, and I'm not putting down a deposit.He was on today.
While worrying about Montana's receding glaciers, (Montana Governor Brian) Schweitzer, who is 50, should also worry about the fact that when he was 20 he was told to be worried, very worried, about global cooling:Then it was global cooling, now it's global warming...what, I wonder, will it be 30 years from now?Science magazine (Dec. 10, 1976) warned of 'extensive Northern Hemisphere glaciation.''
Science Digest (February 1973) reported that 'the world's climatologists are agreed'' that we must 'prepare for the next ice age.''
The Christian Science Monitor ('Warning: Earth's Climate is Changing Faster than Even Experts Expect,'' Aug. 27, 1974) reported that glaciers 'have begun to advance,'' 'growing seasons in England and Scandinavia are getting shorter'' and 'the North Atlantic is cooling down about as fast as an ocean can cool.''
Newsweek agreed ('The Cooling World,'' April 28, 1975) that meteorologists 'are almost unanimous'' that catastrophic famines might result from the global cooling that The New York Times (Sept. 14, 1975) said 'may mark the return to another ice age.''
The Times (May 21, 1975) also said 'a major cooling of the climate is widely considered inevitable'' now that it is 'well established'' that the Northern Hemisphere's climate 'has been getting cooler since about 1950.''