AARP Zorro Saves Train from Banditos
“We make men without chests and we expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and we are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and bid the geldings be fruitful."- C.S. Lewis in The Abolition of Man



Unlike most of the non-religious people I know, I am not opposed to religion. In fact, I tend to prefer believers to agnostics and atheists. They don’t seem to be nearly as self-righteous and self-important. Perhaps it’s unavoidable that if a man doesn’t believe in a superior power, it tends to make him view himself as the center of the universe.Atheist Dr. Keith Burgess-Jackson has written that he always looks for the 'fish' sign in yellow page ads when looking for some service. Dr. John Ray says similar things as well.
The narrative where you pour out of the classroom, tell everyone how wrong they are, and sit back and wait for magic social change is a fantasy cooked up by the Baby Boomers.
The Federal government is like an aircraft carrier: a huge, ponderous weapon that needs a whole lot of special conditions to operate efficiently. People who want everything Federalized do so because they want the "best" weapon trained on the problem. But biggest is not the same as best.
But every time I see some middle class parent prattling about vouchers "destroying" the public schools by "cherry picking" the best students, when they've made damn sure that their own precious little cherries have been plucked out of the failing school systems, I seethe with barely controllable inward rage.
Do not natter about closing the loopholes. Above the complexity level of "Me Urgh! You give Urgh all your acorns!" there is no such thing as a loophole free tax. And come to think of it, I bet Urgh didn't get all the acorns, either.She does have a curious (to me) dislike of supply side economics, which I'll have to explore. Always good to test those preconceived notions, dontcha know.
So what is the best thing America could do "for the children"? Well, it could try not to make the same mistake as most of the rest of the Western world and avoid bequeathing the next generation a system of unsustainable entitlements that turns the entire nation into a giant Ponzi scheme.
[...]There is a conflict between survival and achievement, and we must choose how much of each is desirable. Either extreme can become unbearable. The same choice also faces the individual. If one drives obsessively toward a certain achievement, it could jeopardize one’s chances for survival. If, on the other hand, one is obsessed with survival at any cost, life can become tepid and meaningless.
Today, the pendulum has swung heavily to the side of survival. This is evident in the ever-expanding health craze, and in a general focus on one’s own well-being. Survival is a new idol, expressed in a fanatical drive to eliminate risk. While the individual is being relieved of responsibility and indeed of significance, “society” is expected to implement and enforce risk reduction in everything from bathtubs to ice cream cones. One by one, commonplace activities considered dangerous are regulated out of existence.[...]
We invent threats at an ever-increasing rate. If it’s not second-hand smoke, then it’s an exaggeration of the dangers in routine human action. We go from the ridiculous to the harebrained: At the Starbucks chain of cafés, drinking-straws are wrapped in paper that says, “Not recommended for use in hot beverages.” Children are not allowed to engage in vigorous exercise on school playgrounds, over fear of injury.[...]
Under the regime of survivalism, what is the purpose of “evolving” to a more advanced stage? Are we to become ever more obedient, passive, and helpless? More protected than a flock of sheep in an enclosed meadow?[...]
[...]The only thing that makes the cut-and-run crowd mad enough to fight is the idea that someone, somewhere might be criticizing radical Islam.[...]Coulter gets a lot of criticism for lowering the level of serious, intelligent public discourse. That may be so, but I haven't heard a lot of serious, intelligent public discourse from those of whom Ann is speaking.
...(On the basis of Ahmadinejad's claims, instead of looking for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, how about we start looking for gays in Iran?)[...]
Conservative speakers are constantly being physically attacked on college campuses -- including Bill Kristol, Pat Buchanan, David Horowitz and me, among others. Fortunately the attackers are Democrats, so they throw like girls and generally end up with their noses bloodied by pretty college coeds. But that doesn't make it right.[...]
-Answer not a fool according to his folly,Many put more emphasis on verse 4, Coulter stresses verse 5.
lest you be like him yourself.
-Answer a fool according to his folly,
lest he be wise in his own eyes. (Proverbs 26:4,5 ESV)
One would think that the plainiff's attorney would have scouted the adversary and prepared more thoroughly for the deposition. I believe he was blindsided by his lack of preparation.
[Ours] is chair of the Construction Law and Litigation Section. His practice focuses on representing businesses and individuals in business formation and related business and litigation matters. The largest segment of his business practice relates to construction matters including assisting design professionals, contractors, developers, and owners in facilitating their projects and solving their legal disputes.
He is a member and the Chairman-Elect of the Board of Directors of the Construction Law Section of the State Bar.
He lectures regularly to lawyer and trade groups on construction practices. He is featured in the December 2006 issue of The Wisconsin Law Journal as one of the Top Construction Lawyers in Wisconsin.
In September of 2007, he argued before the Wisconsin Supreme Court in a case which involves a construction dispute where the contractor violated an administrative code and was negligent. The Court addressed whether there should be double damages for negligence damage and code violations, the application of the Economic Loss Doctrine and statutory attorneys fee award.
[...]Norway's King Harald, whose influence pushed the Nobel Committee to act, defended the Committee saying, "I truly don't believe they realized how frivolous and absurd they had become, how ridiculous, vapid, self-centered and dim-witted they appeared to intelligent people all over the world, how silly, provincial and uninformed they made the people of Norway look, how bizarre, counter-productive and downright dangerous some of their choices had been and how hackneyed and self-righteous their announcements sounded."[...]
With regard to the future awards, the Committee issued the following statement: "In light of the Chinese, Russian, Iranian and North Korean threats, the threats of Islamic terrorists and their state-sponsors, and potential breakdown of states into warring tribal factions, the Nobel Peace Prize Committee believes that the U.S. Military will likely be the recipient of every Nobel Peace Prize for the next thirty to forty years. For that reason, the Committee has disbanded and placed its considerable financial resources into the hands of "the only institution capable of maintaining and enhancing the peace of the world." [...]
[...]For those of you who might not be familiar with the female hissy-fit, I will attempt to define it. As a Southern female, descended from a long line of Southern belles and femmes fatales, I was myself perfectly schooled in this necessary tactic in the War Between the Sexes. It’s deceitful; it’s underhanded. It’s definitely a below-the-belt kind of weapon. But, as it was explained to me early in life, it was a most necessary ploy in a world where the male enemy held a significant power advantage in terms of authority and money. It was therefore perfectly acceptable.How is it, then, that President Bush has begun to use his veto power?
It works like this: any time you are not getting your way by using facts and legitimate, reasoned argument, you must overwhelm your male opponent with unassailable emotional turmoil, i.e. a hissy-fit. In other words, take the argument to a level that your male adversary does not comprehend: pure emotion, unencumbered by rational thought. By purposely becoming irrational, and accusing your opponent of being “vicious,” “mean,” “unreasonable,” “vile,” “cruel,” “a bully,” et cetera, et cetera into lingual infinity, you effectively disarm your utterly reasonable opponent and ride the emotional wave of perfected guile to victory. In other words, you get your own way in the matter.
This is precisely the tactic being employed now on a regular basis in our United States Congress.[...]
Perhaps he recognizes the tactic from former confrontations with his perfectly charming, Southern-bred wife, Laura.
3) THE FAMOUS DEPRADATIONS OF THE SO-CALLED “ROBBER BARONS” INVOLVED GOVERNMENTAL, NOT BUSINESS, ABUSES.'Tis an excellently written article, but I still won't vote for Ross Perot.
9) CORRUPTION IS MORE OF A PROBLEM FOR BIG GOVERNMENT THAN BIG CORPORATIONS.
All the Ivy League schools, California-Berkeley, and the Universities of Wisconsin and Michigan want me bad. Columbia University even offered its Pulitzer Prize in addition to the University Presidency to replace the Conservative Lee Bollinger. They also promised a monumental promotional blitz for next year's Nobel Peace Prize.
Back in the early and mid 1980's, President Reagan proposed the development of the Star Wars Defense System, ostensibly to protect American soil from enemy missile attacks. He had other objectives, however, and these slowly simmered on the back burner through the single term of George H.W. Bush and the 8 years of President Bill Clinton. It has only been recently, during the George W. Bush Presidency, that Reagan's vision has finally come to fruition.
Vice President Dick Cheney, along with his Igorish sidekick, Karl Rove, have sold top-secret nanotechnology to the Chi-coms along with 'The Plan'. Chinese dog food producers introduced this technology into its product that was to be sold in the U.S.
Randi Rhodes, a Liberal hot commodity on Air America Radio, unknowingly bought some of this food for her beloved dog. Last Sunday, Ms. Rhodes took little Fido Castro for a constitutional, fell, and was injured.
Jon Elliot, another erudite Air America Radio host, reported that Randi was a victim of a vicious mugging and speculated that it was really a hate-crime of vast right-wing conspiratorial thuggery. When it was finally reported that Ms. Rhodes just fell and was not attacked... lots of snickering... not at Randi's injuries, but instead at the leap of hate-faith jumping to conclusions of conspiracies from Mars. Amateurs.
The reality that remained undetected by all the dilettanti is that the faithful dog tripped Ms. Rhodes and caused the fall and injuries. His nanotech fortified Purina, bolusing through his jejunum, was detected by Reagan's SDS satellites. 'Star Wars' sent a signal to induce the little canine to bolt underfoot in a World Wrestling Federation 'Piledriver', a move that is barred in most states.
Samples of the pup's fecal specimens remain in my refrigerator and the lab results of his positive nanotechoccult tests are in a safe deposit box; definitive proof of 'The Plan.'
Ultimately, therefore & ergo, Ronald Reagan brutally mugged Randi Rhodes.
Thousands of active troops and veterans were subjected to Mr. Limbaugh's unpatriotic and indefensible comments on your broadcast. We trust you will agree that not a single one of our sons, daughters, neighbors and friends serving overseas is a "phony soldier." We call on you to publicly repudiate these comments that call into question their service and sacrifice and to ask Mr. Limbaugh to apologize for his comments.Of course, this flap occurred after Limbaugh called phony soldiers like Jesse MacBeth 'phony soldiers' on his radio show.
Through the continuous support of our donors, we have distributed aid with a value of more than $29,000,000.00 to eligible children. This assistance was primarily rendered to children of Marines or Federal law enforcement personnel who were killed on duty or died under extraordinary circumstances while serving our country at home or abroad. These funds enable us to provide these children with scholarships for their higher education. When a child of a United States Marine is afflicted with a physical or mental disability and requires special medical equipment or tutoring, our Foundation may grant financial assistance to that family if their personal insurance does not cover the complete cost of treatment for this child.Limbaugh, who has long supported and raised money for this organization promises to donate a match to the winning bid.
[...]But the loathing of the Nascar crowd for the inhabitants of Capitol Hill has reached new heights after the decision by Washington political aides to get inoculated before attending a race this weekend.[...]There were some good responses:
The decision to get immunisations, against hepatitis, tetanus and diphtheria,[...]
The Democrat chairman of the committee instructed the aides to get the immunisations[...]
[...]Linda Daves, chairwoman of the North Carolina Republican Party, said: “Democrats should know there is no preventative measure to ward off blue-collar values. If they aren’t careful, they might just catch some of it.” [...]I would like to add my own recommendations adapted from the Baylor College of Medicine:
Patrick McHenry, a North Carolina Republican, said: “If anything, it’s the Nascar fans who should get immunised against Washington officials.”
What Deutch and Savage and the other critics fail to understand is that only a Christian people who truly believes in the correctness, indeed superiority, of their religion will be able to win this fight. A secularized people who believes in nothing but watery principles of tolerance and democracy inevitably will succumb to the combination of violent Islamic intimidation and the "nondiscriminatory" imperatives of their own multicultural worldview. If sharia ever does come to the United States, I am quite certain that its handmaidens will be atheists and liberals, not believing Christians.Bravo!
As a Jew living in this great country, I have no doubt who my enemies are, and who are my allies. And I know to which group Ann Coulter belongs.
-Gore Wins Nobel Prize, High Court Gives It to Bush
-GOP Moves to Label Roman Empire Genocidal
Suddenly, the switch from "of Freedom" to "Freedom from", in the respective titles, struck me as emblematic of the pivotal change of emphases in the Modern world. The history of America from Plymouth Rock until the Crash was essentially the story of Man's struggle for Freedom, but Freedom in a positive sense, Freedom to do things--to worship, to speak, to gather, etc. Thus, McPherson's book details the great convulsion of the 19th Century, the Civil War and the struggle to free the slaves--a struggle to expand freedom. But Kennedy, charting the great 20th Century convulsion, has it exactly right, the importance of the responses to the Depression by both Hoover and Roosevelt lay in their decision to elevate a negative idea of Freedom, freedom from want, from hunger, from "the vicissitudes of life" above, and against, the traditional American ideal of republican Liberty. This shift from a government aimed at protecting Freedom to one designed to provide Security is the single most important thing that happened in 20th Century America.Orrin makes an excellent point. The greatest generation bequeathed this gift to the Boomers, et al., who exuberantly ran with it from there.
"I believe in an almighty God, and I believe that all the world, whether they be Muslim, Christian, or any other religion, prays to the same God."While I fully agree with Mr. Thomas about the statement on a theological level, I believe that he totally missed the President's context.
1871 - Peshtigo FirePeshtigo must buy its carbon credits from me to make environmental amends in order to be returned to the family of man that has been mothered by Gaeia.
On this date Peshtigo, Wisconsin was devastated by a fire which took 1,200 lives. The fire caused over $2 million in damages and destroyed 1.25 million acres of forest. This was the greatest human loss due to fire in the history of the United States. The Peshtigo Fire was overshadowed by the Great Chicago fire which occured on the same day, killing 250 people and lasting three days. While the Chicago fire is said to have started by a cow kicking over a lantern, it is uncertain how the Peshtigo fire began. [Source: Wisconsin Electronic Reader]
Hi, my name's Timmy. My friends the Democrats sent me here to tell you about me and my family and why the Democrats are so good and the Republicans are so evil. You see, my mom and dad work really really hard but they barely make enough to make ends meet. And things are really tough around our house. Dad's always complaining about how expensive everything is.[...]I am sobbing uncontrollably and can't bear to post the rest. If you have the courage to understand Bush's cruelty you may follow the link.

