Friday, October 19, 2007

Kyle-Anne Shiver Describes This Democrat-Led Congress

The Female Hissy-Fit
[...]For those of you who might not be familiar with the female hissy-fit, I will attempt to define it. As a Southern female, descended from a long line of Southern belles and femmes fatales, I was myself perfectly schooled in this necessary tactic in the War Between the Sexes. It’s deceitful; it’s underhanded. It’s definitely a below-the-belt kind of weapon. But, as it was explained to me early in life, it was a most necessary ploy in a world where the male enemy held a significant power advantage in terms of authority and money. It was therefore perfectly acceptable.

It works like this: any time you are not getting your way by using facts and legitimate, reasoned argument, you must overwhelm your male opponent with unassailable emotional turmoil, i.e. a hissy-fit. In other words, take the argument to a level that your male adversary does not comprehend: pure emotion, unencumbered by rational thought. By purposely becoming irrational, and accusing your opponent of being “vicious,” “mean,” “unreasonable,” “vile,” “cruel,” “a bully,” et cetera, et cetera into lingual infinity, you effectively disarm your utterly reasonable opponent and ride the emotional wave of perfected guile to victory. In other words, you get your own way in the matter.

This is precisely the tactic being employed now on a regular basis in our United States Congress.[...]
How is it, then, that President Bush has begun to use his veto power?
Perhaps he recognizes the tactic from former confrontations with his perfectly charming, Southern-bred wife, Laura.

3 comments:

Micah Tillman said...

Oh no! What? *laugh* Laura Bush is a lady. She'd never do such a thing unless George deserved it.

Steve Burri said...

I'm sure that Laura doesn't have the qualitative hissy-fits as the Code Pinksterettes and Cindy Sheehan, but you never know what goes on behind closed doors!

HeatherRadish said...

By purposely becoming irrational, and accusing your opponent of being “vicious,” “mean,” “unreasonable,” “vile,” “cruel,” “a bully,” et cetera, et cetera into lingual infinity, you effectively disarm your utterly reasonable opponent and ride the emotional wave of perfected guile to victory.

Sounds like any leftist when you say something they don't like to hear, but visions of Hillary Clinton danced in my head (need more beer).