Saturday, April 18, 2009

Homeland Security Wuss

If President Obama really had any serious concerns about homeland security and the enemies to American from within, he would immediately dump Janet Napolitano as Secretary of Homeland Security. Napolitano merely makes timid inferences concerning the known dangers within our borders. Oh, yeah, like THAT will scare right-wing extremists!
"Mean capitalist right-wingers who read the Constitution are Poopie-Heads!"

"You're Fired!"

Immediately after chucking Janet for paying taxes or something, the President should appoint a real security tiger, Janeane Garofalo to keep us safe:

Which, let's be very honest about what this is about. It's not about bashing Democrats, it's not about taxes, they have no idea what the Boston tea party was about, they don't know their history at all. This is about hating a black man in the White House. This is racism straight up. That is nothing but a bunch of teabagging rednecks.1
I don't know about you, but I just threw up in my mouth a little bit.

Associated racist tweet posted on IMAO:
My problem with Obama is his color: he’s a Red. Except when dealing with terrorists. Then he’s yellow.
(There is absolutely no truth to the nasty rumor that this post was bought and paid for by the Arms & Ammunition Industry of the U.S.)


James Yanke said...

Napolitano's use of the 1995 Oklahoma City attack as an example of why US military veterans are supposedly a threat to us all certainly is intriguing-

That bombing was a single event, almost 14 years ago- but hasn't Al Qaida staged hundreds of attacks on US interests since then? Why so little mention of them since she was appointed three months ago- isn't keeping a lid on those medieval savages 80% of her job description? Isn't that why the Department of Homeland Security created in the first-place?

Apparently there is no bounds to what government assets Obama will prostitute for his own purposes… while neglecting daunting, actual threats in the meantime.

So all who wondered why Obama chose this obedient toady to head Homeland Security now have their answer: a serious choice who would have focused upon real terrorist threats -not imaginary, partisan ones- like, say, a Rudolph Giuliani, wouldn't have been a willing participant in such a sham report.

Steve Burri said...


Thanks for the visit. Your Reaganite Republican Resistance is an excellent piece of work. Keep it up.